Legal Opinion
Curtis v. Aluminum Ass'n
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided April 24, 1992No. 91-592Published
1Opinion of the Court
607 A.2d 509 (1992)
Arthur S. CURTIS, Appellant,
v.
ALUMINUM ASSOCIATION, et al., Appellees.
No. 91-592.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals.
Argued February 20, 1992.
Decided April 24, 1992.
Arthur S. Curtis, pro se.
Joyce Notarius, for appellee Aluminum Ass'n.
Kenneth G. Roth, for appellee Wolf-Lenkin Ltd. Partnership.
Before ROGERS, Chief Judge, SCHWELB, Associate Judge, and BELSON, Senior Judge.
2Per curiam
The Superior Court of the District of Columbia dismissed appellant's suit against Aluminum Association and other defendants on the ground that the three-year statute of limitations governing such actions…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
3Cases cited17 opinions
- United States v. KubrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Carden v. Arkoma AssociatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Chase Securities Corp. v. DonaldsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Colonial Realty Corporation v. Bache & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
- Willard v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.