Legal Opinion

TESCO DRIVEAWAY CO. v. COMMISSIONER

United States Tax Court

Decided November 6, 2001No. 10966-97Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

TESCO DRIVEAWAY CO., INC., Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent

TESCO DRIVEAWAY CO. v. COMMISSIONER

No. 10966-97

United States Tax Court

T.C. Memo 2001-294; 2001 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 330; 82 T.C.M. (CCH) 857;

November 6, 2001, Filed

Respondent's determination that petitioner was liable for accuracy-related penalty on deficiencies was sustained.

Charles E. Hammond, for petitioner.

Dennis R. Onnen, for respondent.

Beghe, Renato

BEGHE

MEMORANDUM FINDINGS OF FACT AND OPINION

BEGHE, JUDGE: Respondent determined the following deficiencies, late-filing additions, and penalties with respect…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Welch v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. United States v. BoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Sanderling, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
  4. O. H. Kruse Grain & Milling v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
  5. Sanderling, Inc. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1976

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API