Legal Opinion

Mercer v. Flats

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided May 2, 1978No. 3161PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SUTIN, Judge.

Plaintiffs, as lessees, occupied an apartment that belonged to defendant Tajique Flats. Transamerica Insurance Company, as intervenor, was an insurer of defendant. On February 14,1976, a fire occurred in the apartment and destroyed plaintiffs’ personal belongings and damaged defendant’s building. Plaintiffs sued defendants for damages and recovered. Intervenor sued plaintiffs for damages to defendant’s property and was denied recovery. Inasmuch as intervenor stands in the shoes of defendant, both parties will be called defendants. We affirm.

A. The trial court did not 'err…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. AMERICAN EMPLOYERS'INSURANCE CO. v. CrawfordNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1975
  2. McKeough v. RyanNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Hartford Accident and Indemnity Co. v. BeeversNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1972
  4. Barham v. BacaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Perez v. MillerNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1969

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Sena v. New Mexico State PoliceNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API