Legal Opinion

Proctor v. Skinner

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided December 28, 1982No. 13630PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

BURNETT, Judge.

When a sister state demands that Idaho extradite a fugitive from justice, the demanding state must furnish our Governor authenticated copies of documents which “substantially charge the person demanded with having committed a crime under the law of that state.” I.C. § 19-4503. In this appeal we are asked to interpret the phrase, “substantially charge.”

The State of Nevada has accused James Proctor of failing to appear in a Nevada court, for a jury trial on another charge, after being admitted to bail. Such failure to appear, commonly called bail jumping, is defined as a crime by…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Gerstein v. PughSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Michigan v. DoranSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Biddinger v. Commissioner of Police of City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  4. Jacobsen v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Struve v. WilcoxIdaho Supreme Court · 1978

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Gaumer v. ROSSVILLE TRUCK AND TRACTOR CO.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API