Legal Opinion
Hamiter v. Retirement Division of the South Carolina Budget & Control Board
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided April 21, 1997No. 24603PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BURNETT, Justice.
Ann Gell Hamiter appeals the grant of summary judgment to the South Carolina Senate (Senate). We affirm.
FACTS
Hamiter, a Senate employee, was directly employed by Senator John Lindsay. Upon his death in January 1991, she was notified her employment would terminate on February 1, 1991.
*95At the time of termination of her employment, Hamiter was suffering from various illnesses. According to Hamiter, she has been disabled since 1987 due to these medical problems. The Senate does not dispute her disability.
Hamiter alleges, upon her inquiry in 1991, Frank Caggiano, the Clerk of the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- SSI Medical Services, Inc. v. CoxSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1990
- City of Columbia v. American Civil Liberties Union of South Carolina, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1996
- AMA Management Corp. v. StrasburgerCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1992
- Neel v. ClarkSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1940
3Cited by11 opinions
- Bishop v. South Carolina Department of Mental HealthSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
- Strother v. Lexington County Recreation CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
- Hendricks v. Clemson UniversitySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2003
- Hubbard v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2000
- Dorman v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1998
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.