Legal Opinion · Dissent

Bourrett v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 26, 1911Published

Appeal from Woodbury District Court. — Hon. F. R. Gaynor, Judge. Suit to recover for a personal injury. There was a directed verdict for the defendants and a judgment thereon. The plaintiff appeals.

1DissentLadd, J.

(dissenting). — I am unable to concur in what is said in the second paragraph of the opinion concerning the doctrine of last fair chance. It may be doubtful whether defendant, even if it could have discovered plaintiff’s peril, was in such a situation that it should be denounced as negligent in not so stopping its train as to have avoided the injury; but, in my opinion, it should not be held that actual knowledge of plaintiff’s peril was essential, in order to cast upon defendant the onus of exercising ordinary care for his protection thereafter. The majority are mistaken, as I think, in…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. H. & T. C. R'y Co. v. SympkinsTexas Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Kellny v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1890
  3. Bruggeman v. Illinois Central RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1909
  4. Pickett v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
  5. Memphis Street Railway Co. v. HaynesTennessee Supreme Court · 1904

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API