Quapaw Pumping & Royalty Co. v. Camblin
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
MAXEY, C.
This is a suit on an account, which is set out in the record, and also the plaintiffs in error’s brief. This is made an exhibit to the plaintiffs’ petition, and shows a balance of $3,146.19. The original contract upon which this action is based was made| the 18th day of July, 1919, between plaintiffs and defendant Quapaw Pumping & Royalty Company. This contract is set out in detail, as will appear by the statement of the opinion. The Quapaw Pumping & Royalty Company was operating what is known as thei Brinson-Kirtley mine, and the contract is made in relation to that mine.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- McCamant v. BatsellTexas Supreme Court · 1883
- Lamm & Co. v. ColcordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- Dolese Bros. Co. v. Chaney RickardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Burton v. DeweyCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1896
- Eager v. SeedsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Nicholson v. ThixtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1968
- Sanditen v. Brooks Flame-Spray, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
- Whitson v. Wetherbee Electric CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
- Wilcoxson v. McMullinSupreme Court of Colorado · 1936