Legal Opinion

Seyfarth, Shaw, Fairweather & Geraldson v. Lake Fairfax Seven Ltd. Partnership

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided January 10, 1997No. Record 961021PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hassell

In this appeal, we consider whether a law firm that filed an action to collect legal fees from a former client is required to establish with expert testimony that the fees charged to the former client were reasonable. This appeal is presented to us in an unusual procedural posture in that the trial court sustained the defendants’ motion to strike the plaintiff’s evidence at the conclusion of the opening statements.

The law firm, Seyfarth, Shaw, Fairweather & Geraldson, a limited partnership, filed its motion for judgment against Lake Fairfax Seven Limited Partnership and Thomson M. Hirst,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. CaterCorp, Inc. v. Catering Concepts, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1993
  2. CARSON BY MEREDITH v. LeBlancSupreme Court of Virginia · 1993
  3. Mullins v. Richlands National BankSupreme Court of Virginia · 1991
  4. Tazewell Oil Co. v. United Virginia Bank/Crestar BankSupreme Court of Virginia · 1992
  5. Renner v. StaffordSupreme Court of Virginia · 1993

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. Chawla v. BurgerBusters, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1998
  2. Dodge v. TRUSTEES OF RANDOLPH-MACONSupreme Court of Virginia · 2008
  3. Mozley v. Prestwould Board of DirectorsSupreme Court of Virginia · 2002
  4. West Square v. Communication TechnologiesSupreme Court of Virginia · 2007
  5. Lambert v. Sea Oats Condo. Ass'n, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2017

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API