Ad World, Inc. v. Township of Doylestown
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
WEINER, District Judge.
Plaintiff brought this action challenging the constitutionality of an ordinance which made it unlawful to distribute advertising material by certain means to residences without the owner’s or occupier’s consent. We denied the plaintiff’s claim for injunctive relief and damages. 510 F.Supp. 851 (E.D.Pa.1981). On appeal, the Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit held that the ordinance was unconstitutional, and remanded the case to us for further proceedings with respect to the plaintiff’s damage claim consistent with its opinion. 672 F.2d 1136 (3d Cir.1982).
We…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Carey v. PiphusSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Israel Alicea Rosado v. Ramon Garcia SantiagoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1977
- Vance v. Universal Amusement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Lindy Bros. Builders, Inc. v. American Radiator & Standard Sanitary Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Morse v. Republican Party of VirginiaDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 1997
- Yaron v. Township of NorthamptonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- (HC) Walker v. UribeDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
- (PC) Baker v. GriderDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024
- (PC) Foster v. RamirezDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.