Legal Opinion

State v. Adail

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided August 16, 1977No. 37479PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Judge.

Defendant appeals from four convictions of armed robbery and the resultant 20 year terms to be served concurrently. Defendant was tried by a jury and sentenced by the court under the Second Offender Act.

Defendant raises three contentions on appeal: (1) that the court erred in allowing testimony by witnesses regarding line-up identification; (2) the court erred in denying defendant’s motion to suppress identification because the line-up was tainted; (3) the court erred in allowing testimony of another crime. We affirm.

Although no attack upon the sufficiency of the evidence has…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. ReeseSupreme Court of Missouri · 1954
  2. State v. PitchfordSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
  3. State v. BuschmanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1930
  4. State v. SighSupreme Court of Missouri · 1971
  5. State v. JonesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. WoodMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. Adail v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. Aaron Adail v. Donald Wyrick, Warden, Missouri State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1983
  4. Commonwealth v. DoaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  5. State v. TimmonsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API