Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Scaine

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 31, 1984No. 1448PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LIPEZ, Judge:

This is a direct appeal from the judgment of sentence imposed on Thomas Scaine, appellant, upon his conviction of robbery in a non-jury trial, and following the denial of his post-trial motions for a new trial or arrest of judgment. Of the four issues presented in this appeal, two (i.e. impermissibly suggestive identification at preliminary hearing and failure to provide a lineup) were clearly not raised by the appellant in his post-verdict motions, and, consequently, are not properly preserved for our review. Commonwealth v. Blair, 460 Pa. 31, 331 A.2d 213 (1975). Remaining are…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BlairSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. Commonwealth v. GriffinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  3. Commonwealth v. WebbSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  4. Commonwealth v. ThompkinsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  5. Commonwealth v. ThrockmortonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. KyleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Commonwealth v. AndersonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  3. Commonwealth v. SchneiderSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  4. Commonwealth v. CollazoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  5. Commonwealth v. MontgomerySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API