Legal Opinion

Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. Schaffer

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided March 28, 1888PublishedCited by 23 opinions

Appeal from the Appellate Court for the Third District;— heard in that court on appeal from the Circuit Court of Adams county; the Hon. William Marsh, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Magruder

This is an action of case, begun on September 22, 1885, by the appellee against the appellant company, in the circuit; court of Adams county, to recover damages for obstructing; the natural flow of water in a certain water-course, called “Harkness Branch,” by maintaining a certain railroad bridge over said branch, so as thereby to throw the water upon plaintiff’s land and injure the same and'the growing crops thereon. Pleas of the general issue, Statute of Limitations and leave and license were filed to the declaration. There was no special plea setting up the judgment hereinafter named as a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Chicago & Eastern Illinois Railroad v. LoebIllinois Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Ohio & Mississippi Railway Co. v. WachterIllinois Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Vanlandingham v. RyanIllinois Supreme Court · 1855
  4. McConnel v. KibbeIllinois Supreme Court · 1863

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Harvey v. Mason City & Fort Dodge RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
  2. City of Kewanee v. OtleyIllinois Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Admiral Builders Corp. v. Robert Hall VillageAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
  4. Illinois Central R. R. v. FerrellAppellate Court of Illinois · 1903
  5. Kowalczyk v. Swift & Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1925

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API