Legal Opinion

Richardson v. Insurance Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 1, 1904PublishedCited by 3 opinions

ActioN by U. 0. Richardson against tbe Insurance Company of North America, heard by Judge O. M. Cooke, at February Term, 1904, of the Superior Court of G-uilKOed County. From a judgment for the defendant the plaintiff appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

There was a clause in the policy of insurance by which a forfeiture was worked in case there should be any change, other than by the death of the insured, in the interest, title or possession of the subject of insurance (except -change of occupants without increase of hazard), whether by legal process or by judgment or by voluntary act of the insured. The plaintiff in his notice of loss to the defendant company stated that he had made a verbal sale to L. D. McDonald but had pot turned the property over to him. If that had been all of the evidence bearing on the question of a sale of the goods…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Jenkins v. JarrettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1874

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Richardson v. . WoodruffSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
  2. Teague v. Howard Grocery Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
  3. Jenkins v. . JarrettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1874

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API