Legal Opinion

Kopsachilis v. 130 East 18 Owners Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 20, 2007PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*745Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Emily Jane Goodman, J.), entered May 30, 2006, which, inter alia, denied defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff allegedly sustained injuries when she attempted to descend a darkened interior staircase in defendants’ building during a blackout. In view of triable issues as to whether defendants took appropriate measures to maintain the building’s emergency stairwell lighting, summary judgment was properly denied (see Goldstein v Consolidated Edison Co. of N.Y., 115 AD2d 34, 40 [1986], lv denied…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Goldstein v. Consolidated Edison Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Viera v. Riverbay Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  2. Kopsachilis v. 130 East 18 Owners Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API