Legal Opinion

Martin v. Bartell Drug Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 21, 1930No. 21853. En BancPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.

This action was brought to recover for the loss of a number of foxes which it was alleged was due to negligence chargeable to the defendant. The cause was tried to the court and a jury, and resulted in a verdict in favor of the plaintiff in the sum of $4,000. Motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict was made and overruled. A motion for new trial was also made, and this was overruled, conditioned upon the plaintiff electing to remit $1,000 from the verdict and accept a judgment for $3,000, which he did. Judgment was entered in favor of the plaintiff for $3,000, from which the defendant…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Willson v. . Faxon, Williams FaxonNew York Court of Appeals · 1913
  2. West v. EmanuelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1901
  3. Cullinan v. TetraultSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1923
  4. Hendry v. Judge & Dolph Drug Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1922
  5. Gwynn v. DuffieldSupreme Court of Iowa · 1883

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Moultrie Farm Center, Inc. v. SparkmanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API