Martin v. Bartell Drug Co.
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.
This action was brought to recover for the loss of a number of foxes which it was alleged was due to negligence chargeable to the defendant. The cause was tried to the court and a jury, and resulted in a verdict in favor of the plaintiff in the sum of $4,000. Motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict was made and overruled. A motion for new trial was also made, and this was overruled, conditioned upon the plaintiff electing to remit $1,000 from the verdict and accept a judgment for $3,000, which he did. Judgment was entered in favor of the plaintiff for $3,000, from which the defendant…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Willson v. . Faxon, Williams FaxonNew York Court of Appeals · 1913
- West v. EmanuelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1901
- Cullinan v. TetraultSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1923
- Hendry v. Judge & Dolph Drug Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1922
- Gwynn v. DuffieldSupreme Court of Iowa · 1883
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Moultrie Farm Center, Inc. v. SparkmanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1984