Legal Opinion

Patel v. New York State Division of Human Rights

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 19, 1995PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the New York State Division of Human Rights dated January 21, 1994, which dismissed the petitioner’s complaint as time-barred, the petitioner appeals *470from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Kutner, J.), dated June 15,1994, which dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs payable to the respondent Symbol Technologies, Inc.

The determination of the New York State Division of Human Rights that the petitioner’s complaint was time-barred is not arbitrary and capricious or an abuse…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. De Milio v. BorghardNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Aranoff v. Fordham UniversityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Garrison v. State Division of Human RightsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  2. Vig v. New York Hairspray Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API