Legal Opinion

Bakkala v. Hobbs

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 14, 2015No. CV-14-1084Published

1Opinion of the Court

Cite as

2015 Ark. 214

SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS No. CV-14-1084 CRAIG BAKKALA Opinion Delivered May 14, 2015 APPELLANT PRO SE APPEAL FROM THE LEE V. COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT; MOTIONS FOR COPIES, FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL, AND RAY HOBBS, DIRECTOR, ARKANSAS TO FILE SUPPLEMENTAL DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION ADDENDUM APPELLEE [NO. 39CV-14-83] HONORABLE RICHARD L. PROCTOR, JUDGE AFFIRMED; MOTION FOR COPIES DENIED; MOTIONS FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL AND TO FILE SUPPLEMENTAL ADDENDUM MOOT. PER CURIAM Appellant Craig Bakkala, an inmate in the Arkansas Department of Correction, filed a petition for writ of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Henderson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2014
  2. Khabir v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2014
  3. Sims v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2015
  4. Williamson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2015
  5. Arnett v. HobbsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API