Legal Opinion

Murphy v. Capone

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 3, 1990PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for defamation, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Palella, J.), dated April 11, 1989, as granted the defendants’ motion for a final order of preclusion as to certain enumerated items contained in the bill of particulars.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Having received a bill of particulars that they considered to be insufficient, the defendants moved for an order of preclusion or a further bill of particulars (see, CPLR 3042 [d]).…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kursa v. BarratiereAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
  2. Greystone in Westchester Cooperative No. 1, Inc. v. All Boro Paving Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  3. Murphy v. CaponeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gonzalez v. International Business Machines Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  2. Murphy v. CaponeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API