Legal Opinion

Panopulos v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 13, 1989No. H003253PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

FOGEL, J. *

Plaintiff appeals from a summary judgment in favor of defendants in an action for wrongful constructive discharge. We conclude that subsequent California Supreme Court decisions compel dismissal of plaintiff’s discharge-related tort claims regardless of whether summary judgment was warranted at the time of the trial court’s ruling (Foley v. Interactive Data Corp. (1988) 47 Cal.3d 654 [254 Cal.Rptr. 211, 765 P.2d 373]; Newman v. Emerson Radio Corp. (1989) 48 Cal.3d 973 [258 Cal.Rptr. 592, 772 P.2d 1059]) and that plaintiff’s claims for intentional infliction of emotional…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Foley v. Interactive Data Corp.California Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Cole v. Fair Oaks Fire Protection DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Pugh v. See's Candies, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1981
  4. Davies v. KrasnaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Newman v. Emerson Radio Corp.California Supreme Court · 1989

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Turner v. Anheuser-Busch, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Valdez v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  3. Wong v. State Compensation Insurance FundCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
  4. Fidler v. Hollywood Park Operating Co.California Court of Appeal · 1990
  5. Regents of Univ. of California v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API