Legal Opinion

Hansen v. Hood's Creek Drainage District

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 9, 1923Published

1Opinion of the CourtDoerfler, J.

Were questions numbered 2 and 3, submitted by the court in the special verdict, proper questions; and did they fairly represent the true issues on the subject of assessment of benefits, as is contemplated by the statutes? On the subject of benefits, appellant’s counsel requested the submission of the following questions as a part of the special verdict:

“2. Is the assessment of benefits amounting to the sum of sixteen hundred and thirty dollaj-s ($1,630) excessive, taking into consideration all the evidence, facts, and circumstances proven upon the trial of this action?
“3. If you answer the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ehlers v. Automobile Liability Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Guillaume v. Wisconsin-Minnesota Light & Power Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Ward v. BabcockWisconsin Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Rattlesnake Drainage District v. Koshkonong Mud Creek Drainage DistrictWisconsin Supreme Court · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API