Legal Opinion
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Nass
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided December 9, 1992No. 92-1709PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Per curiam
We concur in the board’s findings and its recommendation. Respondent is, therefore, ordered suspended from the practice of law in Ohio for a period of one year, but we suspend imposition of this sanction on the condition stated by the board. Costs taxed to respondent.
Judgment accordingly.
Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.
2Cited by1 opinion
- Disciplinary Counsel v. Scott (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2019