Legal Opinion

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Nass

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 9, 1992No. 92-1709PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

We concur in the board’s findings and its recommendation. Respondent is, therefore, ordered suspended from the practice of law in Ohio for a period of one year, but we suspend imposition of this sanction on the condition stated by the board. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Disciplinary Counsel v. Scott (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2019