Mississippi Poultry Association, Inc. v. Edward R. Madigan, Secretary of the United States Department of Agriculture
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1DissentReayley, Circuit Judge
The issue is whether Congress used “same” in 21 U.S.C. § 466(d) to mean “equivalent” or “identical.” Under Chevron, U.S.A., Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., 467 U.S. 837, 104 S.Ct. 2778, 81 L.Ed.2d 694 (1984), we must effectuate Congress’ choice if Congress has “directly spoken to [this] precise question.” Id. at 843, 104 S.Ct. at 2781-82.1 If Congress did not choose between identicality and equivalence, we must respect the Secretary’s interpretation of section 466(d) if it is “reasonable.” Id. at 844, 104 S.Ct. at 2782-83.
The majority holds that Congress chose identicality…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
- Connecticut National Bank v. GermainSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.