Legal Opinion · Dissent

Scherer v. Scandrett

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided November 14, 1944No. 46500Published

1DissentBliss, J.

(dissenting) — I dissent from the majority opinion because, in my judgment, it clearly trespasses upon the province of the jury, violates sound and long-recognized principles of law and procedure, and passes without mention our latest reaffirmance of a number of these principles in Coonley v. Lowden, 234 Iowa 731, 12 N. W. 2d 870.

I recognize, of course, that the issue of freedom from contributory negligence is not always for the jury. But I insist that this court and all courts have uniformly held that the issue is ordinarily for the jury, and that it is the very exceptional case when it is a…

2Cases cited119 opinions

  1. People v. GarbuttMichigan Supreme Court · 1868
  2. Artz v. Chicago, R. I. & P. R. R.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1871
  3. Ernst v. . Hudson River Railroad Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1866
  4. Knutson Ex Rel. Knutson v. LurieSupreme Court of Iowa · 1933
  5. Carlson v. MeusbergerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1925

114 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API