Ingalls v. Noble

Lake, Ch. J.

But two errors are complained of: first, that the motion for a continuance was improperly denied; and, second, that the verdict was not supported by the evidence.

Ordinarily the decision of motions of this sort is left to the discretion of the particular court to which they are *273addressed. It is only where such discretion has evidently been exercised unwisely or abused, to the prejudice of a party, that a reviewing court will interfere. Billings v. McCoy Brothers, 5 Neb., 187. Johnson v. Dinsmore, 11 Id., 391. In this case we not only see no abuse of discretion but the motion was…