Legal Opinion

Barrett v. Odom, May and DeBuys

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 1, 1984No. 81-601PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON APPLICATION FOR REHEARING

After further consideration of this case, the original opinion is withdrawn, and the following is substituted as the opinion of the Court.

Celeste Barrett and Carolyn Allan formed a partnership, Cedar Bark Lot 14 (hereinafter "Cedar Bark"), which purchased a parcel of real estate containing a residential dwelling from Barrett Builders, Inc., a corporation apparently owned or controlled by Celeste Barrett's then-husband, Raymond. In connection with the purchase Mrs. Barrett and Mrs. Allan executed and delivered a promissory note and a mortgage in the amount of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Cohen v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1975
  2. Woods v. Commercial Contractors, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1980
  3. Carroll v. MaloneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1856
  4. Sims v. ReinertSupreme Court of Alabama · 1970
  5. Stone v. GoldbergAlabama Court of Appeals · 1912

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Beavers v. County of WalkerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1994
  2. Smith v. CITICORP PERSON-TO-PERSON FINANCIAL CENTERSSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
  3. Washburn v. RabunSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
  4. Deupree v. RuffinoSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  5. Co-Ex Plastics, Inc. v. AlaPak, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1988

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API