Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Nelson

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 23, 1903No. Nos. 12,764 — (18)Published

' Appeal by defendants from an order of the district court for Steele county, Buckham, J., denying a motion for a new trial, after a trial and conviction of the crime of murder in' the first degree.

1DissentLewis, J.

I do not accept the introductory declarations of the opinion as an expression of my views upon the enforcement of the criminal law by the courts of this state. I am not aware of any such abuse of the judicial function as to call for any such expressions from this court. People v. Neumann, 85 Mich. 98, 48 N. W. 290 — referred to in the opinion as authority for the statement that the Supreme Court of Michigan has taken an advanced and commendable position in denying a new trial. when it appeared from the record that the accused was unquestionably guilty — when examined, discloses the fact that…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. NeumannMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Dennis v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  3. People v. GallagherMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Jones v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Martin v. Walter CourtneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API