Legal Opinion

National Engraving Co. v. Queen City Laundry

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided November 13, 1912No. 16,818PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from the district court for Adams county: Harry S. Dungan, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Rose, j.

The amount in controversy is $41.99. At 154 Nassau street, New York, plaintiff was engaged in supplying advertising matter to merchants and others, while defendant was conducting a laundry at Hastings. This is an action to recover the agreed price of advertising matter alleged to have been furnished by plaintiff to defendant under the following contract: “It is agreed that the National Engraving Company will not be held responsible for any provisions not embodied in writing herein, and that this contract cannot be canceled without the written consent of the said company. National…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Esterly Harvesting Machine Co. v. FrolkeyNebraska Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Gill v. S. Kaufman & Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1876
  3. Keeler v. Paulos Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1906
  4. Washington Hydraulic Press Brick Co. v. SinnottNew York Supreme Court · 1905

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Theno v. National Assurance Corp.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1937
  2. State ex rel. Davis v. Banking HouseNebraska Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Florence Home for the Aged v. MusgroveNebraska Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Elliott Supply Co. v. HansonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1917
  5. National Bank of Commerce v. BossemeyerNebraska Supreme Court · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API