Legal Opinion

United States v. William D. Frazell and Martha T. Frazell

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided April 5, 1965No. 20758PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Per curiam

In support of the appellees’ petition for rehearing, briefs were filed by the ap-pellees and three amici curiae. The Commissioner responded to these briefs, and the four proponents of appellees’ position filed briefs in x-eply. After careful consideration of the arguments and authorities thus presented, we are persuaded that our original decision was a correct one.

Among the arguments presented in the appellees’ behalf on this petition is that the first two sentences of Treas. Reg. § 1.721-1 (b) (1) require a different result from that reached in our original decision. The pertinent language…

2Cited by15 opinions

  1. Diamond v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1971
  2. Hensel Phelps Constr. Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1980
  3. Hensel Phelps Construction Company, and Cross-Appellee v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, and Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983
  4. James v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1969
  5. Morrison v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1972

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API