Lee v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Pope, Chief Judge.
Defendant Gordon Clifford Lee was convicted of distributing obscene material in violation of OCGA § 16-12-80, and appeals.
1. Defendant originally filed his appeal in the Supreme Court, contending that court had jurisdiction of this appeal because he was challenging the constitutionality of OCGA § 16-12-80, “in that the statute has no provision for a pre- or post-seizure adversarial hearing following the seizure of allegedly obscene materials.” The Supreme Court transferred the appeal to this court, on the basis that the issue raised required the application of settled…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Pope v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Jenkins v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Thayer v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
- Fishman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Tidwell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1995
- Appling v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
- Appling v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
- Austin v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
- Lee v. City of Rome, Ga.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1994