Legal Opinion · Dissent

CULLEN, JEREMIAH v. AT&T INC.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 10, 2016No. CA 15-01563Published

1Dissent

Whalen, P.J., and Lindley, J.

(dissenting). We respectfully dissent in part and would affirm because we conclude that Supreme Court properly granted plaintiff’s cross motion for partial summary judgment on liability under Labor Law § 240 (1). As noted by the majority, plaintiff was working on a cell phone tower approximately 180 feet above the ground with his full body harness tied off to a part of the tower, he had used “choker slings” that looked like “giant rubber band[s]” to lower himself down from a horizontal boom for access to a tower mounted amplifier, and he sustained injuries when…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Zimmer v. Chemung County Performing Arts, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. Diaz v. New York Downtown HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 2002
  3. Robinson v. East Medical CenterNew York Court of Appeals · 2006
  4. Felker v. Corning Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1997
  5. Gallagher v. New York PostNew York Court of Appeals · 2010

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API