Legal Opinion
Harry Sagansky v. United States of America, Morris Weinstein v. United States
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided March 25, 1966No. 6609_1PublishedCited by 79 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McENTEE, Circuit Judge.
These appeals are from judgments of conviction entered on jury verdicts finding the defendants Sagansky and Wein-stein guilty of knowingly using wire communication facilities for the transmission of wagers in interstate commerce in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1084 (a). 1 The indictment is in five counts. The first four charge the defendants jointly with the commission of this offense on four separate occasions in February 1964. 2 The fifth count charges Sagansky alone with violation of this statute on January 23, 1964.
There appears to be no dispute as to the material…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Stilson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Idaho Sheet Metal Works, Inc. v. WirtzSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Paul A. Gorin v. United States of America, Henry Grillo v. United States of America, Saul Glassman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1963
- Earl Johnson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1963
- Jacobs v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by79 opinions
- Lesly Cohen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967
- United States v. SouthardCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1983
- United States v. CiampagliaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1980
- William Clayton Pierce v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- United States v. Rufus Eafie HarrellCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.