Legal Opinion

Lagow v. Patterson

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 17, 1824PublishedCited by 2 opinions

ERROR to the Daviess Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHolman, J.

After a verdict in favour of Patterson against Lagow, Hay, Parke, and Ewing, a motion was made in arrest of judgment, because the capias had not been executed on Lagow and Parke; which motion was overruled by the Circuit Court.

The defendants were charged as partners. One of the regular attorneys, practising in the Circuit Court, appeared for them and pleaded in bar of the action in a plea entitled Lagow et al. fyc. A regular defence was made through.all the proceedings, and the names of all the defendants frequently appear in the record as being before the Court. No suggestion is made that…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hills v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1796

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Solar Sources, Inc. v. Air Pollution Control BoardIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Slauter v. HollowellIndiana Supreme Court · 1882

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API