Legal Opinion

Dorset Caterers, Inc. v. Nassau & Suffolk Dining Car & Restaurant Ass'n

Nassau County District Court

Decided October 12, 1971PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdward J. Poulos, J.

Plaintiff moves to strike defendant’s answer pursuant to CPLR 3126 for failing and refusing to sign the transcript of the examination before trial heretofore taken of defendant.

Defendant counters with the argument that:(1) “that many of the questions that were asked and answered by him (defendant’s witness) were not in the record ’ ’;

*688(2) that the examination was improperly taken in that defendant’s attorneys’ stenographer was used in taking the testimony.

The attorneys for defendant rely on a letter they sent in which they claim to have rejected the examination before trial because at the time…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Peters v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1964

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Merck, Sharp & Dohme v. Whitted, New York County Courts1973
  2. Adamo v. Kirsch Beverages, Inc.Suffolk County District Court · 1974
  3. Principale v. LewnerNew York Supreme Court · 2001
  4. In re the Estate of MancusoNew York Surrogate's Court · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API