Legal Opinion

Hawley Lumber Co. v. Nordling

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 25, 1926No. 25,391PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtHour, J.

There was a verdict for defendant. Upon plaintiff’s motion in the alternative for judgment non obstante or a new trial,' the court ordered judgment in its favor and defendant appeals.

The action is brought upon a promissory note executed by defendant and her deceased husband. The note, was secured by a mortgage on a farm, executed at the same time. It was for a balance due plaintiff for lumber furnished for a granary and garage on the farm and for building a home in Hawley. Both the farm and the lot on which the home was built belonged to the husband. The defenses which defendant set up were…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Insell v. McDanielsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1926
  2. American Multigraph Sales Co. v. GrantSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
  3. Dowagiac Manufacturing Co. v. Van ValkenburgSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. First State Bank v. HellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API