Legal Opinion

Borman v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.

District Court, N.D. Indiana

Decided November 22, 1968No. Civ. No. 4641Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

BEAMER, District Judge.

This is a diversity action filed by the plaintiff Borman against the defendants A & P and Morton Foods.

Plaintiff alleges that the defendant A & P sold him an unwholesome frozen chicken dinner which he ate. Immediately thereafter he became nauseated and ill, accompanied by vomiting. He contends that the cause of his illness was the unwholesome frozen chicken dinner which defendant sold him, in violation of an implied and express warranty as to fitness for human consumption. Count II of plaintiff’s complaint alleges the same facts, but is grounded on negligence.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Olster v. Kiamesha Concord, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1964
  3. Rubel v. GrossmanDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API