Legal Opinion

State v. Drew

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 5, 1935PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The following opinion was filed December 4, 1934:

Fairchild, J.

In criminal prosecutions, upon motion before trial, evidence will be suppressed when it has been reduced to possession by officers of the state through an unlawful search and seizure by such officers. Glodowski v. State, 196 Wis. 265, 220 N. W. 227. The sufficiency of form and substance of appellant’s motion to suppress the evidence in this case is the subject of inquiry on this appeal. Courts will not deny a litigant a hearing or refuse to protect him in his rights merely because of informality in his application for relief. But…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Glodowski v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928
  2. State v. BaltesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Alexander v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1926
  4. Bergman v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Arthurs v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1926

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Gray v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Hartman v. HartmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1948
  3. State v. HunterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API