Legal Opinion

Selmer v. Smith

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 23, 1925No. Appeal, 351PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Simpson,

Three partners, who were residents of Berks County, were sued in the courts of Philadelphia County, and the summons was served on two of them while they were temporarily in the latter county. The three filed a petition averring that the service upon one of their number “was procured......through deception and fraud, in enticing and inducing the [one] defendant into the said City and County of Philadelphia by false and fraudulent statements and representations [later specified], at the instance and procuration of plaintiffs, or their agent or agents,’’ and prayed…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Penn Mutual Life Insurance v. AustinSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  2. Kinter v. Commonwealth Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  3. Waring v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1896
  4. Prettyman v. IrwinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  5. Montgomery Bros. v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Jacobs v. HalloranSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  2. Lutherland, Inc. v. DahlenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  3. Benner v. Tacony Athletic Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  4. Manson v. First National Bank in IndianaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  5. Joseph Melnick Building & Loan Ass'n v. MelnickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API