People v. Mays
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Mejda
Defendants were each charged by information with one count of armed robbery. A jury found both defendants guilty and they were sentenced to terms of four to six years. On appeal defendants contend that: (1) they were denied their right to a fair trial because of repeated suggestions made at trial that they had committed other crimes; (2) the complaining witness’ testimony was insufficient to prove them guilty beyond a reasonable doubt; (3) the court improperly admitted hearsay evidence of the complaining witness’ out-of-court identification of defendants; and (4) they were denied their right…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Doyle v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- People v. PickettIllinois Supreme Court · 1973
- People v. ManionIllinois Supreme Court · 1977
- People v. StringerIllinois Supreme Court · 1972
- The People v. SolomonIllinois Supreme Court · 1962
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- People v. MorrowAppellate Court of Illinois · 1999
- People v. SargentAppellate Court of Illinois · 1989
- People v. WilsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984
- People v. GrierAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
- People v. RodriquezAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.