Legal Opinion
Wimberly v. Imel
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided February 22, 1961No. A-12947PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BUSSEY, Judge.
The petitioner, William L. Wimberly, a professional bondsman in the City of Tulsa, Oklahoma, seeks a writ of prohibition against the judges of the Municipal Criminal Court of Tulsa, Oklahoma, preventing them from proceeding to try him on a charge of violating City Ordinance No. 6072, § 16(b), the material part of which is:
“A professional bondsman shall not enter a jail, or other place where persons charged with offenses cognizable by the Municipal Court of the City of Tulsa are detained in the City of Tulsa for the purposes of obtaining employment as a bondsman, without having…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Bennett v. District Court of Tulsa Co.Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1945
- Burns v. District Court of Oklahoma CountyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1959
- Farmer v. SanfordCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1960
- In Re HeffnerCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1919
3Cited by5 opinions
- State ex rel. Shelton v. BurnsideWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2002
- River Riders, Inc. v. SteptoeWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2008
- Gardner v. LambertCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1968
- SER Owners Insurance v. Hon. Warren R. McGraw, JudgeWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2014
- State ex rel. Owners Insurance v. McGrawWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2014