Legal Opinion

Hedeen v. Bausinger

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 31, 1927No. 1132PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtJustice, J.

The original action was brought by one Henry Bausinger against Ed Hedeen in the Crawford Common Pleas for recovery of damages for an alleged breach of a contract of warranty in the sale of a second hand truck, which was sold on Oct. 3, 1924, at Bucyrus, Ohio.

Bausinger claims that he told Hedeen he intended to use the truck in hauling fruit and vegetables to market; that Hedeen warranted it to be fit for such purpose; that the truck was used 30 days and returned to Hedeen for th ereason that it was not fit for the purposes for which it was warranted; that by reason thereof Bausinger suffered…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Schumacher v. Iron Fireman Manufacturing Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API