Legal Opinion

Elliott v. Staron

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided August 31, 1999No. AC 17774PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

2Per curiam

This is an appeal from the judgment of the trial court rendered for the plaintiffs, holding that the defendant breached the lease between the parties. The defendant, Raymond Staron, executor, claims *633that the trial court improperly concluded that he (1) breached the lease and the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing and (2) tortiously interfered with the plaintiffs’ business relations, thereby committing a violation of the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act (CUTPA), General Statutes § 42-110a et seq. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

This action was commenced by…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re Karrlo K.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1996
  2. Elliott v. StaronConnecticut Superior Court · 1997

4Cited by5 opinions

  1. Elliott v. StaronSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
  2. Dorestin v. Hollywood Imports, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
  3. Elliott v. StaronSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
  4. Jenny B Realty LLC v. Danielson LLCDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2020
  5. Willow Funding C. v. Grencom Associates, No. Cv 95-0146003 S (Jan. 19, 2000)Connecticut Superior Court · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API