Boykin v. Rosenfield & Co.
Texas Supreme Court
Appeal from Marion. Tried below before the Hon. W. P. McLean.
1Opinion of the Court
Stayton, Associate Justice.
This action was brought by the appellees to recover from J. T. Boykin a debt secured by chattel mortgage, which they sought to foreclose. They alleged that a part of the mortgaged property was in the possession of P. T. Norwood and another part in the possession of G. T. Todd. Desiring to sequester the property, they made the necessary affió davit, which showed that the mortgaged property, consisting of five hundred pine logs, was in the possession of the defendants Norwood and Todd, the former having three hundred, and the-latter two hundred.
The logs were described…
2Cited by15 opinions
- Hughes v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1909
- Montgomery v. Peach River Lumber CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1909
- H. O. Wooten Grocer Co. v. Wade Meat Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1931
- Pitluk & Meyer v. ButlerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
- Houston Oil Co. of Texas v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.