Sioux Falls Motor Co. v. Styke
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
CAMPBELL, J.,
Plaintiff instituted the action below in claim and delivery to recover the possession of a certain automobile. Possession thereof was taken at the time of the institution of the action, and defendant did not rebond. The complaint is very brief, alleging merely the corporate existence of plaintiff; that plaintiff is entitled to the immediate possession of 'the automobile in question and alleging the value thereof; that the same is wrongfully and unlawfully detained from plaintiff by defendant; that demand for possession has been made and refused. The prayer is for possession and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Jerke v. Delmont State BankSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1929
- New York Life Insurance v. MasonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1921
- Hawley v. BondSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1905
- Barney v. BrannanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1883
3Cited by1 opinion
- Styke v. Sioux Falls Motor Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1932