Legal Opinion

Palisano v. Bankers & Shippers Insurance

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 22, 1948PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHalpern, J.

This case presents a novel question of construction under the standard form of fire insurance policy adopted in 1943 (L. 1943, ch. 671, amdg. Insurance Law, § 168). The new form of insurance policy eliminated the so-called “ moral hazard ” clauses which had formerly appeared in the New York standard form fire insurance policy. Among others, it omitted the provision that 1 ‘ if the interest of the insured be other than unconditional and sole ownership ” or “ if any change, other than by the death of an insured, take place in the interest, title, or possession of the subject of insurance ”, the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Kernochan v. . the New-York Bowery Fire Insurance CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1858

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Commercial Stand. Ins. Co. of Ft. Worth, Tex. v. HitsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Hayland Farms Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  3. Barnes v. Lititz Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 1956
  4. Palisano v. Bankers & Shippers InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API