Harts v. State

I dissent because this Court does not have jurisdiction of this appeal. The Majority has acknowledged:

“At the outset it must be noted that appellant filed his motion to correct errors on the sixty-first day following the judgment in his hearing. Having filed his motion to correct errors late, he has failed to comply with Ind.Rules of Procedure, Trial Rule 59(C). Failure to file a timely motion to correct errors preserves no error for review by this Court.”

Page 716. Yet, the Majority Opinion assumes jurisdiction of this appeal and affirms the judgment of the trial court. The Indiana Supreme…