Legal Opinion

Gould v. Barnard

Montana Supreme Court

Decided April 16, 1894PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Second Judicial District, Silver Bow County. Action to foreclose mechanic’s lien. Judgment was rendered for the plaintiffs below by McHatton, J.

1Per curiam

The record herein presents a singular case. The action was brought to enforce payment of $345.60 for certain plumbing alleged to have been done in defendant’s building, situate in the city of Butte, Montana, by foreclosure of a mechanic’s lien on said building. The controversy centers upon the plumbing done in fitting rooms in said building to be occupied by Dr. Murray. It appears that the block was rebuilt, after destruction by fire, by J. W. Lambourn, contractor and builder, under a contract with defendant, Barnard, the owner of said property; that such contract provided for the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McKay v. Montana Union Railway Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Sweeney v. Great Falls & Canada Railway Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1892

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hall v. Northern Pacific Ry. Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1919
  2. T. C. Power & Bro. v. StockingMontana Supreme Court · 1902

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API