Legal Opinion

People v. Cullen

New York Court of Appeals

Decided May 6, 1980PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Jasen, J.

The issue presented on this appeal is whether there is *172evidence in the record to support the jury’s finding that Nassau County had geographical jurisdiction of the offense of which defendant was convicted.

Defendant, Paul Cullen, agreed to assist a confidential informant in obtaining a substantial quantity of peyote, a controlled substance. On February 9, 1976, the confidential informant telephoned defendant and arranged the sale which formed the basis of the instant criminal charges. Thereafter, the informant and an undercover police officer drove to defendant’s…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. SamuelsNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. People v. MooreNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  3. People v. ErmoNew York Court of Appeals · 1979

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. People v. KassebaumNew York Court of Appeals · 2001
  2. People v. CohenNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. People v. DonovonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  4. People v. LowenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  5. People v. WashingtonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API