In Re the Marriage of Kleist
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
NEUMAN, Justice.
This dissolution of marriage action is before us on further review from a split decision in the court of appeals. That court reversed a custody ruling that would have given the mother primary care of the parties’ daughter. The reversal stemmed from the court of appeals’ view that the district court gave undue weight to the mother’s strongly *275held cultural beliefs, leading it to effectively reinstate the “tender years” doctrine long ago abandoned by this court.
Our de novo review leads us to conclude that the best interest of the child — not gender or cultural stereotyping —…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In Re the Marriage of WinterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1974
- In Re the Marriage of VrbanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1984
- In Re the Marriage of BowenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1974
- In Re the Marriage of WillSupreme Court of Iowa · 1992
- First National Bank of Dubuque v. MacKeySupreme Court of Iowa · 1983
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Spiker v. SpikerSupreme Court of Iowa · 2006
- In Re the Marriage of FordSupreme Court of Iowa · 1997
- In Re the Marriage of MalloyCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2004
- Brian Albert Mahedy v. Amanda Jean GibsonCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2018
- Doug Lee Still v. Tanya Lyn AvenariusCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2014
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.