Horton v. Andrie, Inc.
District Court, W.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
QUIST, District Judge.
Plaintiff, Donald Horton (“Horton”), has sued Defendant, Andrie, Inc. (“Andrie”), under the Jones Act, 46 U.S.C.App. § 688, and general admiralty and maritime law seeking maintenance, cure, and wages as a result of injuries Horton sustained while working as a crew member aboard Andrie’s vessel, the Barge A-390 (the “Barge”), an unmanned tank barge. Horton claims that Andrie was negligent and that the Barge A-390 was unseaworthy, at least in part, because the Barge lacked a handhold or handrail on the stairs descending from the main deck of the Barge to the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Poulis Minott v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
- Fuszek v. Royal King Fisheries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Nice v. Chesapeake and Ohio Railway CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1969
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Andrie Inc. v. Department of TreasuryMichigan Court of Appeals · 2012
- In re Complaint of Foss Maritime Co.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2015