Legal Opinion

Lynch v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided December 3, 1857PublishedCited by 36 opinions

APPEAL from the Tippecanoe Court of Common Pleas.

1Opinion of the CourtPerkins, J.

Information charging the defendant with retailing. Conviction and fine.

On the trial, the Court refused to permit counsel to argue the question of law to the jury, on the ground that the Court was the sole judge of that. A question as to the constitutionality of a statute was raised.

By the constitution, the jury, in criminal cases, are the judges of the law and the facts. In such cases, therefore, counsel have the same right to argue the question of law, as they have to argue questions upon the facts. And if it would be error to prohibit counsel to argue a case at all, it was error in the…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cited by36 opinions

  1. Herring v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. State v. HoytSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1880
  3. Doe v. Methodist HospitalIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Rooker v. BruceIndiana Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Taylor v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1981

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API